Robert Anton Wilson - novelist, philosopher, and self-described “agnostic mystic” - popularized the concept of reality tunnels as a way to understand how our perceptions are filtered by belief¹. In Wilson’s view, each of us lives in a kind of mental tunnel constructed from our assumptions, experiences, and biases, through which we interpret the world. This idea isn’t presented as a cosmic absolute or a call to abandon truth, but rather as a practical framework for critical thinking and mental flexibility. In what follows, we’ll explore what reality tunnels are (and are not), how Wilson suggested using this concept through concrete exercises, where it aligns with modern cognitive science (and where it doesn’t), and how to apply reality tunnels as a cognitive tool without sliding into a swamp of “nothing is true, everything is permitted” relativism.

What Is a “Reality Tunnel”?

Wilson borrowed the term “reality tunnel” from his friend and fellow iconoclast Timothy Leary². A reality tunnel refers to the subjective lens or filter through which an individual perceives the world. Our brains do not take in all aspects of reality objectively; instead, we subconsciously select and interpret stimuli in ways that conform to our prior beliefs and experiences¹². In Wilson’s colorful phrasing, “we believe what we see and then we believe our interpretation of it… we don’t even know we are making an interpretation most of the time. We think this is reality”³. In truth, what each person perceives is heavily edited by psychological and cultural conditioning. Reality, as we individually experience it, is more like a map or model in our minds - a tunnel with only a narrow view of the full spectrum of the world⁴.

It’s important to note what this idea doesn’t mean. Emphasizing reality tunnels is not to claim that no objective reality exists at all, nor that all opinions are equally valid. Wilson was not denying the existence of facts; rather, he argued that our access to facts is always mediated by our mental filters¹. As the Wikipedia entry on reality tunnels puts it, the concept “does not necessarily imply that there is no objective truth; rather that our access to it is mediated through our senses, experience, conditioning, prior beliefs, and other non-objective factors”¹. In other words, there is a real world, but each of us can only grasp parts of it, and often in distorted ways. We are all, in a sense, naive realists by default - assuming our personal worldview represents reality itself - unless we learn to recognize our own tunnel vision³.

One vivid way to grasp this is to consider optical illusions or ambiguous images.
An example is the classic Rubin’s vase illusion: some viewers see a white vase in the center, while others see two black faces in profile. The image remains the same, but perception shifts based on how one’s brain interprets the shapes. This is a simple illustration of how the same raw data can yield different “realities” in different minds. On a more significant scale, two people with different belief systems may witness the same event and come away with entirely different interpretations of what happened. As one commentator summarized: “No world view may encompass the whole world… Two people may experience the same event yet perceive entirely different occurrences”⁵. Each person is viewing the situation through their own reality tunnel.

Wilson loved to point out that once we realize everyone including ourselves is perceiving through a tunnel, it becomes easier to understand disagreements and conflicts. Others aren’t necessarily being stupid, evil, or deliberately perverse when they disagree with us - they may simply be in a different tunnel, starting from different assumptions³. Recognizing this can foster empathy and open-mindedness: “when we begin to realize that we are all looking from the point of view of our own reality tunnels,” Wilson said, “the ones who don’t have the same reality tunnels as us do not seem ignorant or lying or hypnotized by some mad ideology. They just have a different reality tunnel”³. This attitude is extremely relevant in today’s climate of ideological polarization, where groups often seem to inhabit totally separate realities. Wilson’s message is that in a sense, they do - and understanding that is the first step to bridging the divide.

Reality Tunnels and Cognitive Biases

Modern cognitive science lends support to Wilson’s idea. Researchers have extensively documented phenomena like confirmation bias, which closely parallels the reality tunnel concept²¹. Confirmation bias is the tendency to notice and trust information that confirms our prior beliefs, while ignoring or explaining away anything that contradicts them². In effect, our brains act as filtering machines, preferentially letting in data that fits our existing narrative. Over time, this filter reinforces itself: each person gathers evidence for their own worldview and becomes more blind to alternatives²². A staunch advocate of a political ideology, for instance, will literally perceive news and events in a way that supports their stance - often unconsciously discarding facts that don’t fit². As Wilson quipped in Prometheus Rising, “what the thinker thinks, the prover proves” - our minds are very skilled at cherry-picking perceptions to validate our current beliefs.

Psychologically, then, a “reality tunnel” is not a mystical notion but a recognition of how the human nervous system operates. Our sensory organs and brain evolved to simplify and interpret the torrent of raw data around us, not to give us an objective picture of everything²². We construct a workable model of the world that highlights what we expect to find. This idea goes back at least to Immanuel Kant, who observed that we never know the “thing-in-itself” directly, only the appearances shaped by our mind’s categories². More recently, neuroscientists talk about the brain as a prediction machine - constantly generating expectations that shape what we perceive. In everyday terms, this is why two people can see the same ambiguous figure or hear the same speech and come away with different perceptions: their brains are filling in gaps and resolving ambiguities in line with their personal priors (their existing mental models).

Wilson drew parallels between reality tunnels and such scientific insights. He cited the work of psychologists and linguists (like Alfred Korzybski’s general semantics and Benjamin Whorf’s ideas on language shaping thought) to argue that much of what we “see” is actually our own projection. In one oft-quoted line, he said, “every kind of ignorance in the world all results from not realizing that our perceptions are gambles” - gambles that our brain is taking, often without our awareness³. We bet on certain interpretations and then live as if those were truth. Cognitive biases like motivated reasoning (where we rationalize away inconvenient facts) further cement these tunnels. The end result is that most people walk around utterly convinced that their view simply is reality, not noticing the degree to which they have constructed that view².

The reality tunnel concept also anticipated what we now see with algorithm-driven information bubbles. Social media feeds, for example, automatically filter and personalize content to match our interests - effectively locking us into a digitally reinforced reality tunnel. We end up “seeing” mostly what we already agree with, which deepens polarization. Wilson, writing decades earlier, warned that people tend to get stuck in “static, artificial charades” of fixed belief¹¹. He suggested that becoming aware of our mind’s filtering is crucial if we want to escape manipulation by others’ narratives or our own ingrained prejudices¹¹. In Prometheus Rising (1983), which serves as a guidebook to exploring various reality tunnels¹, Wilson’s goal was to teach readers how to recognize and reprogram their own mental filters.

Wilson’s Techniques for Shifting Reality Tunnels

One of the most appealing aspects of Wilson’s work is its practical orientation. He didn’t just describe reality tunnels in theory - he offered playful exercises and experiments to help people experience the phenomenon and loosen the grip of their own bias. Many of these exercises are aimed at cultivating what he called “guerrilla ontology” or “Maybe Logic” - the art of continually challenging one’s own certainties and keeping an agile, questioning mind³⁶. Here are a few of Wilson’s reality-tunnel bending techniques and how they might benefit us:

• Seek Out Opposing Perspectives: Wilson suggested deliberately exposing yourself to ideas that contradict your current worldview. For example, “if you are a liberal, subscribe to the conservative National Review_… try to enter their reality-tunnel for a few hours while reading. If you are a conservative, subscribe to the_ New York Review of Books_… If you are a rationalist, subscribe to_ Fate Magazine_. If you are an occultist, read_ The Skeptical Inquirer_”_². The point is not to change your beliefs overnight, but to stretch your mind by stepping into others’ shoes. In modern terms, this is like curating your social media or news diet to include dissenting voices. Wilson believed that doing this regularly makes your own thinking more “balanced, neutral and multidimensional,” free from the blinders of tribal dogma². Rationalist communities have independently embraced similar practices - for instance, the “ideological Turing test,” where one tries to argue from the opponent’s viewpoint convincingly. All these serve to remind us that other people’s reality tunnels can contain valid insights we might miss if we never leave our own.
• Try On New Beliefs - Temporarily: In Prometheus Rising, each chapter ends with “mind exercises” urging readers to adopt an unfamiliar belief system or identity for a short time. Wilson would have you pretend, as an experiment, that you believe something you normally reject, and observe how your perceptions shift. For instance, he suggests writing a paper from the perspective of a devout Catholic defending the Church’s holiness - then write another from the perspective of a fierce atheist or anti-clerical critic². Or spend a week behaving as if you were a conspiracy theorist convinced “your phone is bugged” and secret agencies are watching you². Note how quickly you start noticing “evidence” of surveillance everywhere - letters that look tampered with, strangers glancing at you - all the classic signs of confirmation bias at work². Then, for contrast, Wilson says to flip to an opposite, positive outlook: act for a week as if “Everybody likes me and is trying to help me achieve my goals,” and see how differently you interpret people’s behavior². Follow that by a day acting as if “I am God playing at being human. I created every reality I notice” - a dramatic metaphysical claim - and maybe another day with “Everything works out more perfectly than I plan it”². These exercises range from ideological to almost mystical stances, but they all serve a common purpose: to demonstrate the malleability of perception. By adopting even a wildly paranoid or fantastically optimistic belief for a short time, you directly feel how your mind starts bending reality to fit the narrative²². The lesson is both humbling and empowering: humbling, because it shows how subjective our “reality” is; empowering, because it implies we can choose to modify our perspective once we realize it’s a construct.
• “Metaprogram” Your Mind: Wilson was inspired by psychologist John Lilly’s notion of the brain as a “biocomputer” that can be reprogrammed or “metaprogrammed” by its user¹. In practical terms, this means cultivating the ability to change your mind’s programming at will - to intentionally shift your reality tunnel instead of being stuck with whatever conditioning you happened to receive. Wilson endorsed tools ranging from meditation and neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) to biofeedback devices and even psychedelic drugs as ways to interrupt your habitual filters and install new ones¹. For example, meditation can help one observe thoughts without clinging to them, gradually weakening rigid belief patterns. Psychedelics (which Wilson experimented with) can temporarily scramble default assumptions and produce novel insights - though they are not without risks. Even a simple act like role-playing or imagination can be a metaprogramming tool: one of Wilson’s quirky exercises was to list similarities between a busy city and a termite colony, then read Hindu scriptures and mentally replace terms like “Atman” (soul) with “DNA blueprint” - basically, to force a creative reconceptualization of life’s patterns². Such games were meant to jolt the mind into seeing from a totally different frame of reference. The ultimate aim of metaprogramming is flexibility: as Wilson wrote, a “fully functioning human” should be able to zoom in and out of different reality tunnels, choosing the most helpful lens for the situation at hand²². Rather than one fixed worldview, you cultivate a toolkit of many perspectives.
• Language Awareness (E-Prime): As a more fine-grained cognitive tool, Wilson was a proponent of E-Prime - a form of English that excludes the verb “to be.” The idea came from linguist Alfred Korzybski’s work and was embraced by Wilson to reduce dogmatism in thought and speech³. In English, saying “X is Y” (e.g. “This idea is stupid” or “He is evil”) implies an absolute identification. E-Prime forces you to rephrase such statements into more tentative forms like “I feel X behaves stupidly in this scenario” or “He acts in ways I consider evil.” The effect is a constant reminder that you are speaking from a particular viewpoint, not pronouncing God’s own truth³. Wilson found this habit useful for keeping his reality tunnel permeable. It’s a way of training oneself to distinguish perception from reality - much like saying “maybe” instead of insisting “is.” While talking in E-Prime can be cumbersome, it instills a valuable skepticism about one’s own assertions. It nudges us toward describing the world in terms of experience (“the film made me laugh”) rather than unqualified judgment (“the film is good”)³. This linguistic trick complements Wilson’s broader program: it helps clarify thinking and prevent the confusion of our mental models with reality itself.

All these techniques - cross-checking other viewpoints, playing with temporary beliefs, metaprogramming, mindful language - are means to the same end: breaking out of the prison of a single perspective. In a sense, Wilson was teaching a form of cognitive self-defense. He saw rigid, dogmatic belief as a kind of malware that infects the mind, leading to prejudice and even violence³³. The antidote was to cultivate fluidity: an awareness that your current map of reality is not the territory, and an ability to travel between different maps. This can boost creativity (since you’re able to generate and consider far-out ideas), and it certainly aids critical thinking (since you’re less likely to take your own assumptions as gospel). Artists and innovators often do this intuitively - they re-frame problems, adopt unconventional viewpoints, or imagine worlds different from the status quo. Wilson systematized it for everyday individuals. He believed that “each person’s reality tunnel is their own artistic creation”³, so we might as well learn to create ours artfully and consciously, rather than remain confined in a tunnel someone else (society, upbringing, algorithms) built for us.

Do Wilson’s Ideas Hold Up? (Strengths and Limitations)

Wilson’s reality tunnel concept has aged remarkably well in some respects. Decades before terms like “filter bubble” or “post-truth” entered the lexicon, he was warning that humans are prone to self-sealing belief systems and perceptual blinders. Today’s psychology and neuroscience broadly affirm this: our brains are not unbiased cameras but opinionated storytellers. Wilson’s emphasis on intellectual humility - the idea that we should hold all our models lightly and be ready to update them - resonates with modern rationalist thinking and scientific skepticism. He often said his goal was to get people into a state of “generalized agnosticism… about everything”³. In a world overflowing with propaganda, echo chambers, and motivated reasoning, that advice seems more relevant than ever. Adopting multiple perspectives and questioning one’s own “reality” is a powerful antidote to extremism and closed-mindedness. Indeed, Wilson anticipated the kind of metacognitive skills now taught in critical thinking courses: questioning assumptions, considering alternative hypotheses, and recognizing the difference between observation and inference.

However, not all of Wilson’s ideas fare equally well under scrutiny. He was a product of his era (the late 20th-century counterculture) and was influenced by then-fashionable theories that haven’t stood the test of time. For example, Prometheus Rising leans heavily on Timothy Leary’s eight-circuit model of consciousness, a speculative framework dividing human psychology into eight evolutionary “circuits.” This model is regarded as pseudoscience today⁷ - it’s more a psychedelic metaphor than a neuroscience-backed theory. Similarly, Wilson often made freewheeling references to quantum physics (hence his book Quantum Psychology) to suggest that reality at its deepest level is ambiguous or “observer-dependent.” While it’s true that quantum mechanics challenges naive realism, critics argue that pop-cultural interpretations of it (like “we create reality by observing it”) are misleading when applied wholesale to everyday life. In short, readers should be wary of taking Wilson’s occasional scientific analogies too literally - he was more poet than rigorously trained scientist, and he mixed solid insights with some New Age-flavored speculation.

Another area of Wilson’s work that can feel dated or problematic is his optimism about human evolution. Influenced by Leary and the 1970s human potential movement, Wilson believed that humanity was on the verge of transcending its current state - that we might evolve into a kind of “superhuman” with higher intelligence and maybe even paranormal abilities. He and Leary promoted concepts like Space Migration, Intelligence Increase, and Life Extension (cheekily acronymized as SMI²LE). In Wilson’s writings you’ll find the assertion that the human brain is evolving rapidly and that with the right techniques (from yoga and psychedelics to cybernetics) we could unlock extraordinary powers⁸⁸. With hindsight, these techno-utopian hopes appear over-optimistic. We did not all turn into immortal space travelers by the 21st century, and such claims aren’t well-supported by empirical science. In fact, Wilson’s enthusiasm for a coming leap in consciousness was so strong that one commentator notes he “fell for another reality-tunnel” - namely, the Californian futurist faith in imminent superhuman evolution⁸. It’s a gentle irony that the master of maybeLogic sometimes did hitch himself to grandiose ideas. To his credit, Wilson usually framed even these beliefs in a tentative way (he would say “I think this is happening” rather than “I know”), and later in life he tempered some of that optimism. But readers can rightly question those parts of his work: Where’s the evidence? Why assume evolution has a teleological aim towards godlike intelligence? Such ideas are speculative at best.

Perhaps the biggest concern people have with reality tunnels is the specter of relativism. If everyone’s reality is a tunnel of their own making, does that mean there’s no truth? That anything goes, and we can never say someone is wrong? This worry is encapsulated in the dramatic slogan “Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.” - a phrase associated with Hassan i Sabbah (legendary leader of the Assassins) and popularized in countercultural and chaos magic circles⁵. It sounds as if embracing Wilson’s outlook might lead one to nihilism or moral anarchy: if each of us is locked in a subjective reality, why not just pick whatever belief is convenient and discard any notion of shared truth or ethics?

Wilson was keenly aware of this danger - in fact, he often referenced that slogan only to critique it. He walked a fine line, advocating agnosticism and model-pluralism but not a descent into “anything is true if I believe it.” The nuance is that while no single model of reality is complete or infallible, some models are more useful and evidence-backed than others. We should not “fall in love” with any one worldview⁴, but neither should we pretend that reality is just a subjective whim. Wilson maintained that there are still constraints - physical, logical, empirical - that any workable reality tunnel must respect. For example, no matter your perspective, if you jump off a cliff believing you can fly, gravity will have its say. As he wryly noted, “the world is not bound by the confines of our worldviews”⁵ - the real world can surprise or shatter any given tunnel at any time. Thus, the art of living in a reality tunnel is not to deny reality, but to remember our view is partial and be ready to adjust it when faced with solid evidence.

In practice, Wilson’s philosophy encourages deep skepticism - including skepticism of your own skepticism. He counseled to “not believe anything” with absolute certainty⁸, because the moment you do, your intelligence stops growing. Belief is the death of thought, in his view, when it hardens into dogma⁸. However, this is not the same as saying “believe nothing at all” or “there’s no point in seeking truth.” It means holding beliefs provisionally, as working hypotheses rather than final answers. Wilson often emphasized the importance of evidence and reason in navigating multiple model realities. In one passage he laments that too many people form strong opinions “whether they know anything about it or not,” and lack understanding of the different standards of proof in science, law, etc.⁸. This is a clear indication that Wilson valued critical thinking. He wanted people to distinguish between “I reckon it might be so” and “I have proven it to a high degree”⁸. In other words, relativism in his framework does not mean all claims are equal - it means all claims should be treated as conditional, to be tested and continually re-evaluated.

Another safeguard Wilson advocated is humor and humility. Throughout his works, even when he dived into wild occult or conspiracy ideas, he maintained a tongue-in-cheek tone and a willingness to say “maybe it happened, maybe it didn’t.” He famously said “Convictions make convicts”, implying that the more trapped you are by a fixed belief, the more your mind is in jail. By treating even his own most cherished ideas as semi-serious play, he avoided the fanaticism that plagued some of his contemporaries. (Not everyone fared as well - Wilson recounts how a friend who co-created a spoof conspiracy ended up actually paranoid, a victim of the very mind games they played⁸⁸.) The lesson here is that flexibility must be paired with sanity checks. You can explore alternate realities, but you should have a firm rope tying you to logic, compassion, and empirical feedback so you don’t drift off entirely. Wilson admired Aleister Crowley’s dictum for occult experimenters: “students are most earnestly warned against attributing objective reality or philosophical validity to any of [these experiences]”⁸. In plain terms: don’t get too lost in the sauce of your subjective adventures. Treat it as exploration, not final revelation.

Using Reality Tunnel Insight Without “Permissive” Relativism

So how can one apply Wilson’s reality tunnel ideas constructively today? The key is balance. We can use the concept as a tool to question our own assumptions and better understand others, while still keeping our feet on the ground. Here are a few guidelines distilled from Wilson’s work and the surrounding discussion:

• 1. Remember there is an objective reality - we’re just bad at perceiving it. Acknowledging reality tunnels should make you less arrogant about your worldview, but it doesn’t mean giving up on learning about the real world. Think of it this way: there is a territory, but all we have are maps. No single map is 100% accurate, but by comparing maps and venturing into new territory, we can improve our understanding over time. Science, for example, progresses by continuously challenging and refining models - it’s essentially institutionalized reality-tunnel testing. Wilson’s approach invites us to do this in our personal beliefs. As the magician/philosopher Bill Whitcomb put it: “Rationality is limited by the intellect, the world is not… The trick is to switch from one model to another as it becomes appropriate”⁵. In short, be agile in mind but respect that there are facts and consequences out there.
• 2. Use “Maybe” as a mental tool. Wilson literally wrote a book called The Maybe Logic and loved the word “maybe.” If you catch yourself thinking or speaking in absolutes (“X is definitely Y”), try adding a “maybe” or otherwise softening the claim. Notice how this opens you to new information. For example, instead of “my political philosophy is 100% correct,” say “maybe my philosophy is correct about these aspects, but I could be wrong or incomplete.” This isn’t weakness; it’s intellectual honesty. It creates space for dialogue and learning. Crucially, it can prevent you from falling into the trap of confirmation bias - because if you admit you might be wrong, you’ll be more receptive to evidence that challenges you. Adopting this stance means you won’t fit neatly into ideological tribes (since you refuse to say you’re absolutely right), and that’s okay. Wilson’s own persona confounded people because he refused to plant his flag on any single “ism.” He seemed paradoxical - skeptics thought him too mystical, mystics thought him too skeptical⁶ - but that was exactly the point of maybeLogic. It kept him free from other people’s boxes.
• 3. Test multiple models against reality, not just in your head. It’s fun and mind-expanding to “try on” wild ideas or inhabit contrarian perspectives, as Wilson recommends. But how do we avoid becoming unmoored? The answer is to continually test ideas in the real world. If you take on a new belief (even temporarily), look at predictive power and outcomes. Does this way of thinking help you navigate life better? Does it explain more without causing bigger problems? Wilson’s method was experimental: he would entertain, say, the hypothesis of telepathy or extraterrestrial signals (as he recounts in his book Cosmic Trigger), but he always stopped short of insisting they were objectively true unless he had sufficient proof. You can do the same with any claim - political, spiritual, etc. Treat it like a lab experiment: “If this were true, what would I expect to observe? What happens if I act as if it’s true?” Measure the results. Reality has a way of delivering feedback. Some models will fail, or contradict each other; some will be situationally useful but not universally. By comparing notes with others and consulting hard evidence, you can figure out which parts of your reality tunnel are illusions and which correspond to solid terrain. In Wilson’s words, “few people know the difference between an opinion and a proof… they are full of opinions, but they have little ability to distinguish the relative degree of proof” backing those opinions⁸. Don’t be that person - check which of your beliefs have strong proof and which are lighter guesses.
• 4. Retain ethics and compassion. Perhaps the most important safeguard against “everything is permitted” nihilism is basic empathy and ethics. Wilson was a libertarian-leaning thinker who valued individual freedom, but he was also deeply humanistic. He argued that since all our belief systems are fallible, it’s wise to be wary of any ideology that justifies cruelty or violence in the name of Absolute Truth⁴. In his view, nobody’s reality tunnel grants them the right to dominate or destroy others. On the contrary, realizing the fragility of our own perception should make us more compassionate. We’re all struggling within our subjective tunnels; we all make mistakes about reality. This perspective fosters forgiveness and tolerance. Julian Gough, summarizing Wilson, put it succinctly: “Given that all beliefs are based on faulty and inadequate information, we should not give too much weight to them. In particular, we should not mess other people around, or kill them, on the basis of our beliefs.”⁴. In practice, use your expanded perspective to communicate better rather than manipulate. When you see someone firmly stuck in a reality tunnel that you think is wrong, remember that harsh confrontation rarely works. Instead, share experiences, ask questions, and maybe invite them to consider a “what if you were wrong?” scenario - just as you do for yourself. Keeping ethics at the center ensures that exploring alternative realities remains a tool for understanding, not an excuse for deceit or moral nihilism. As Wilson liked to remind readers, “Don’t fall in love with any one model” - not even his own model of multiple models⁴. Stay curious, but also stay kind and grounded.

Conclusion

Robert Anton Wilson’s reality tunnels are a powerful metaphor turned mental technology. They remind us that our view of the world is both deeply personal and inevitably partial. By using Wilson’s techniques - whether it’s playing with contrary beliefs, practicing “maybe logic,” or simply remembering that the map is not the territory - we can cultivate more critical, creative, and flexible thinking. These ideas help inoculate us against fanaticism and foster a mindset where learning and curiosity trump dogma. At the same time, engaging with reality tunnels should not lead to despair about truth or a free-for-all of “make up your own reality.” Wilson’s legacy, at its best, is a call to be open-minded and discerning, skeptical and compassionate.

Sources

• Robert Anton Wilson, Prometheus Rising (1983) - New Falcon Publications
• Robert Anton Wilson, Cosmic Trigger Vol. I (1977) - And/Or Press
• Robert Anton Wilson, Quantum Psychology (1990) - New Falcon
• Reality Tunnel - Wikipedia article
• Jack Fox-Williams, “Reality Tunnels: How to Reprogram Your Mind” - Medium (2020)
• Jordan Bates, “Reality Tunnels: An Intro to Robert Anton Wilson” - Refine The Mind (2014)
• Julian Gough, “Robert Anton Wilson reduced to an essence” - juliangough.com (2007)
• Jules Evans, “Robert Anton Wilson on integrating weird experiences” - Philosophy for Life (2021)
• Matthew Rossi, “The Truth and the Truth” - Fantastic Metropolis (2005)

References

Footnotes

1. Wikipedia - Reality Tunnel ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹²

2. Medium - Reality Tunnels: How to Reprogram Your Mind ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³ ↩¹⁴ ↩¹⁵ ↩¹⁶ ↩¹⁷ ↩¹⁸ ↩¹⁹ ↩²⁰ ↩²¹ ↩²² ↩²³

3. Refine The Mind - Reality Tunnels: An Intro to Robert Anton Wilson ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³

4. Julian Gough - Robert Anton Wilson reduced to an essence ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

5. Fantastic Metropolis - The Truth and the Truth ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

6. LessWrong - Rational philosophies comment ↩ ↩²

7. Wikipedia - Prometheus Rising ↩

8. Philosophy for Life - Robert Anton Wilson on how to integrate weird experiences ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹